150%-time completion
150%-time completion at Lurleen B Wallace Community College fell 38% between 2007 and 2010 (41.5% → 25.9%).
Andalusia, Alabama. 1,122 undergraduate students. 21 programs in the federal Field-of-Study dataset.
Short-arc shifts (recent 3-year window), peer outliers, earnings trend breaks, completion drops, enrollment cliffs, and debt-to-earnings warnings — surfaced deterministically from the federal record. Multi-decade shifts are reported separately in the Long Arc section, since 25-year tuition drift isn't really an anomaly.
150%-time completion at Lurleen B Wallace Community College fell 38% between 2007 and 2010 (41.5% → 25.9%).
100%-time completion at Lurleen B Wallace Community College rose 46% between 2009 and 2010 (17.8% → 25.9%).
In-state tuition at Lurleen B Wallace Community College rose 12% between 2021 and 2024 ($4.6k → $5.2k).
Each tile compares this institution to the Alabama median for the same metric. Sub-line shows the comparison value, not an interpretation. Sparklines trace the federally available history.
Treasury tax-record earnings for federally aided students who first enrolled at this institution. Each point is a horizon from the most-recent vintage. Single median per horizon (no p25/p75 publishing).
Federally available history. Coverage varies by metric — IPEDS publishes some series only after 2009 and others only before.
17.8% → 25.9%
55.0% → 63.5%
$1,740 → $5,190
$3,300 → $9,060
43.9% → 31.8%
$24,900 → $32,036
$22,900 → $30,010
Each row is one (CIP × credential) program reported by the institution in College Scorecard's Field-of-Study data. Cohort floor is 30 students; below this, federal data is suppressed.
Programs are grouped by 2-digit CIP family. Programs without reported earnings are hidden to keep the list focused.
Picked by Carnegie sector × predominant credential level. These are not rankings — just nearest-neighbour surfaces for comparison.
Median earnings describe what cohorts earned. They do not describe what attending Lurleen B Wallace Community College caused. Selection effects (who admits, who enrolls, who completes) are real. We publish federal data with strict descriptive phrasing — and link the methodology where you can read about the limitations directly.