California · Private for-profit · Predominantly certificates

Fredrick and Charles Beauty College

Eureka, California. 67 undergraduate students. 1 programs in the federal Field-of-Study dataset.

ANOMALY ENGINE · NOTABLE SIGNALS

What the data flags at Fredrick and Charles Beauty College

Short-arc shifts (recent 3-year window), peer outliers, earnings trend breaks, completion drops, enrollment cliffs, and debt-to-earnings warnings — surfaced deterministically from the federal record. Multi-decade shifts are reported separately in the Long Arc section, since 25-year tuition drift isn't really an anomaly.

LONG-ARC SHIFT · TRENDING WORSE-29%

150%-time completion

150%-time completion at Fredrick and Charles Beauty College fell 29% between 2007 and 2010 (82.9% → 58.9%).

LONG-ARC SHIFT · TRENDING BETTER+61%

100%-time completion

100%-time completion at Fredrick and Charles Beauty College rose 61% between 2009 and 2010 (9.4% → 15.1%).

LONG-ARC SHIFT · TRENDING WORSE-19%

First-year retention

First-year retention at Fredrick and Charles Beauty College fell 19% between 2007 and 2010 (80.7% → 65.0%).

COMPLETION DROP · TRENDING WORSE-14pp

150%-time completion

150%-time completion fell 14 pp at Fredrick and Charles Beauty College vs the 2004–2008 baseline (65.2% vs 78.8%).

SECTION 01 · OUTCOMES SNAPSHOT

The numbers, vs. California

Each tile compares this institution to the California median for the same metric. Sub-line shows the comparison value, not an interpretation. Sparklines trace the federally available history.

MEDIAN EARNINGS · 10Y
$21,826+22% · 6→10y
California median $42,588
MEDIAN EARNINGS · 6Y
$17,889
Treasury earnings · 6y post-entry
COMPLETION · 150%
65.2%-20% · '97→'10
California median 61.3%
MEDIAN FEDERAL DEBT
±0% · '97→'99
At program completion
UNDERGRAD ENROLLMENT
67+143% · '96→'10
latest IPEDS
RETENTION
88.2%-20% · '04→'10
first-time, full-time
ADMISSION RATE
±0% · '01→'09
latest cohort
IN-STATE TUITION
annual
SECTION 02 · EARNINGS HORIZONS

How earnings spread, 4 to 10 years after entry

Treasury tax-record earnings for federally aided students who first enrolled at this institution. Each point is a horizon from the most-recent vintage. Single median per horizon (no p25/p75 publishing).

ALL FEDERALLY AIDED STUDENTS · TAX-RECORD EARNINGSVINTAGE 2025-05
Earnings widen with time post-entry. Selection: federal-aid recipients only — not all graduates.Methodology →
SECTION 04 · LONG ARC

Ten-plus year arc

Federally available history. Coverage varies by metric — IPEDS publishes some series only after 2009 and others only before.

UNDERGRAD · 1996201090
922919962010
Undergraduate enrollment.IPEDS EF
COMPLETION 150% · 1997201058.9%
88%59%19972010
150%-time completion rate.IPEDS GR
MEDIAN DEBT · 19971999$2,625
$2,625$2,62519971999
Median federal student debt at exit.SCORECARD
COMPLETION · 150% · 19972010-20%

Fredrick and Charles Beauty College · completion · 150% fell

73.7% → 58.9%

COMPLETION · 100% · 20092010+61%

Fredrick and Charles Beauty College · completion · 100% rose

9.4% → 15.1%

RETENTION · 20042010-20%

Fredrick and Charles Beauty College · retention fell

81.0% → 65.0%

UNDERGRAD ENROLLMENT · 19962010+27%

Fredrick and Charles Beauty College · undergrad enrollment rose

37 → 90

PELL SHARE · 20082010+37%

Fredrick and Charles Beauty College · pell share rose

43.3% → 59.5%

SECTION 05 · PROGRAMS

Ranked by 5-year earnings

Each row is one (CIP × credential) program reported by the institution in College Scorecard's Field-of-Study data. Cohort floor is 30 students; below this, federal data is suppressed.

SECTION 06 · BY CIP FAMILY

1 programs with earnings, grouped

Programs are grouped by 2-digit CIP family. Programs without reported earnings are hidden to keep the list focused.

PERSONAL & CULINARY SERVICES · CIP 12

CAUSAL DISCIPLINE

Fredrick and Charles Beauty College graduates earn $X” — not “Fredrick and Charles Beauty College makes you earn $X”

Median earnings describe what cohorts earned. They do not describe what attending Fredrick and Charles Beauty College caused. Selection effects (who admits, who enrolls, who completes) are real. We publish federal data with strict descriptive phrasing — and link the methodology where you can read about the limitations directly.

Methodology →