Undergraduate enrollment
Undergraduate enrollment at Ventura Adult and Continuing Education rose 56% between 2006 and 2009 (81 → 126).
Ventura, California. 52 undergraduate students. 10 programs in the federal Field-of-Study dataset.
Short-arc shifts (recent 3-year window), peer outliers, earnings trend breaks, completion drops, enrollment cliffs, and debt-to-earnings warnings — surfaced deterministically from the federal record. Multi-decade shifts are reported separately in the Long Arc section, since 25-year tuition drift isn't really an anomaly.
Undergraduate enrollment at Ventura Adult and Continuing Education rose 56% between 2006 and 2009 (81 → 126).
Median federal debt at exit at Ventura Adult and Continuing Education fell 30% between 2006 and 2009 ($2.1k → $1.5k).
Each tile compares this institution to the California median for the same metric. Sub-line shows the comparison value, not an interpretation. Sparklines trace the federally available history.
Treasury tax-record earnings for federally aided students who first enrolled at this institution. Each point is a horizon from the most-recent vintage. Single median per horizon (no p25/p75 publishing).
Annual debt service as a share of median earnings 10 years after entry, computed under federal Direct loan terms (10-year fixed at 6%). The 8% line is the gainful-employment threshold from federal regulation; above 12% has historically been considered “failing” under prior rule cycles.
Median federal debt $3,920 amortized over 10 years vs. median earnings $38,232 (10y after entry).
Federally available history. Coverage varies by metric — IPEDS publishes some series only after 2009 and others only before.
$3,884 → $1,481
21.6% → 0.0%
$32,100 → $41,427
Picked by Carnegie sector × predominant credential level. These are not rankings — just nearest-neighbour surfaces for comparison.
Median earnings describe what cohorts earned. They do not describe what attending Ventura Adult and Continuing Education caused. Selection effects (who admits, who enrolls, who completes) are real. We publish federal data with strict descriptive phrasing — and link the methodology where you can read about the limitations directly.