+131%
Median federal debt at exit
Median federal debt at exit at Taylor Institute of Cosmetology II rose 131% between 2006 and 2009 ($2.6k → $6.1k).
Indiana · Private for-profit · Predominantly certificates
Taylor Institute of Cosmetology II
Knox, Indiana. 45 undergraduate students. 1 programs in the federal Field-of-Study dataset.
ANOMALY ENGINE · NOTABLE SIGNALS
What the data flags at Taylor Institute of Cosmetology II
Short-arc shifts (recent 3-year window), peer outliers, earnings trend breaks, completion drops, enrollment cliffs, and debt-to-earnings warnings — surfaced deterministically from the federal record. Multi-decade shifts are reported separately in the Long Arc section, since 25-year tuition drift isn't really an anomaly.
+89%
3-year cohort default rate
3-year cohort default rate at Taylor Institute of Cosmetology II rose 89% between 2012 and 2015 (17.6% → 33.3%).
-43pp
150%-time completion
150%-time completion fell 43 pp at Taylor Institute of Cosmetology II vs the 2003–2007 baseline (14.3% vs 57.4%).
-15%
Undergraduate enrollment
Undergraduate enrollment at Taylor Institute of Cosmetology II fell 15% between 2021 and 2024 (52 → 44).
SECTION 01 · OUTCOMES SNAPSHOT
The numbers, vs. Indiana
Each tile compares this institution to the Indiana median for the same metric. Sub-line shows the comparison value, not an interpretation. Sparklines trace the federally available history.
$14,236+0% · 6→10y
Indiana median $46,945$14,203
Treasury earnings · 6y post-entry14.3%-12% · '99→'09
Indiana median 60.7%—+131% · '03→'09
At program completion45+33% · '96→'24
latest IPEDS87.5%+45% · '04→'24
first-time, full-time—-5% · '01→'09
latest cohort—
annualSECTION 02 · EARNINGS HORIZONS
How earnings spread, 4 to 10 years after entry
Treasury tax-record earnings for federally aided students who first enrolled at this institution. Each point is a horizon from the most-recent vintage. Single median per horizon (no p25/p75 publishing).
Earnings widen with time post-entry. Selection: federal-aid recipients only — not all graduates.Methodology →
SECTION 04 · LONG ARC
Ten-plus year arc
Federally available history. Coverage varies by metric — IPEDS publishes some series only after 2009 and others only before.
Undergraduate enrollment.
150%-time completion rate.
Median federal student debt at exit.
+45%
Taylor Institute of Cosmetology II · retention rose
69.0% → 100.0%
+131%
Taylor Institute of Cosmetology II · median debt rose
$2,625 → $6,063
+56%
Taylor Institute of Cosmetology II · cohort default rate rose
21.4% → 33.3%
-59%
Taylor Institute of Cosmetology II · pell share fell
42.5% → 17.5%
FINANCIAL OUTCOME · ILLUSTRATION
Estimate the financial outcome at Taylor Institute of Cosmetology II
Pick a program. Cost from Scorecard net price by family income; earnings from Treasury 5-year-post-completion median, projected forward with a Mincer age-earnings curve. The selection-bias toggle applies the Dale-Krueger shrinkage. Outcomes illustration, not a forecast — see methodology.
Shrinks the earnings premium toward the matched-applicant mean. STEM <15%, business ~40%, arts & education ~60%.
NET PRESENT VALUE
-$429,647
Over 40 years, discounted 5.0%
BREAKEVEN
—
Doesn’t reach breakeven within the horizon
- Cost per year
- $9,019
- HS-only baseline · IN
- $36,400
- Years to complete
- 1
- CIP family
- 12
Outcomes illustration · not a forecast. Projects observed Scorecard earnings forward with a Mincer age-earnings curve under your assumptions. See methodology for the math.
SECTION 07 · SIMILAR INSTITUTIONS
Same sector and degree mix in Indiana
Picked by Carnegie sector × predominant credential level. These are not rankings — just nearest-neighbour surfaces for comparison.
CAUSAL DISCIPLINE
“Taylor Institute of Cosmetology II graduates earn $X” — not “Taylor Institute of Cosmetology II makes you earn $X”
Median earnings describe what cohorts earned. They do not describe what attending Taylor Institute of Cosmetology II caused. Selection effects (who admits, who enrolls, who completes) are real. We publish federal data with strict descriptive phrasing — and link the methodology where you can read about the limitations directly.