+53%
Undergraduate enrollment
Undergraduate enrollment at Chisholm Trail Technology Center rose 53% between 2006 and 2009 (60 → 92).
Oklahoma · Public · Predominantly certificates
Chisholm Trail Technology Center
Omega, Oklahoma. 23 undergraduate students. 13 programs in the federal Field-of-Study dataset.
ANOMALY ENGINE · NOTABLE SIGNALS
What the data flags at Chisholm Trail Technology Center
Short-arc shifts (recent 3-year window), peer outliers, earnings trend breaks, completion drops, enrollment cliffs, and debt-to-earnings warnings — surfaced deterministically from the federal record. Multi-decade shifts are reported separately in the Long Arc section, since 25-year tuition drift isn't really an anomaly.
+40%
150%-time completion
150%-time completion at Chisholm Trail Technology Center rose 40% between 2006 and 2009 (33.3% → 46.7%).
SECTION 01 · OUTCOMES SNAPSHOT
The numbers, vs. Oklahoma
Each tile compares this institution to the Oklahoma median for the same metric. Sub-line shows the comparison value, not an interpretation. Sparklines trace the federally available history.
$27,170-6% · 6→10y
Oklahoma median $38,465$29,000
Treasury earnings · 6y post-entry61.5%-38% · '97→'09
Oklahoma median 52.9%—
At program completion23-41% · '96→'09
latest IPEDS87.5%-10% · '04→'24
first-time, full-time—
latest cohort—
annualSECTION 02 · EARNINGS HORIZONS
How earnings spread, 4 to 10 years after entry
Treasury tax-record earnings for federally aided students who first enrolled at this institution. Each point is a horizon from the most-recent vintage. Single median per horizon (no p25/p75 publishing).
Earnings widen with time post-entry. Selection: federal-aid recipients only — not all graduates.Methodology →
SECTION 04 · LONG ARC
Ten-plus year arc
Federally available history. Coverage varies by metric — IPEDS publishes some series only after 2009 and others only before.
Undergraduate enrollment.
150%-time completion rate.
-38%
Chisholm Trail Technology Center · completion · 150% fell
75.0% → 46.7%
-32%
Chisholm Trail Technology Center · undergrad enrollment fell
156 → 92
-61%
Chisholm Trail Technology Center · pell share fell
20.0% → 7.7%
FINANCIAL OUTCOME · ILLUSTRATION
Estimate the financial outcome at Chisholm Trail Technology Center
Pick a program. Cost from Scorecard net price by family income; earnings from Treasury 5-year-post-completion median, projected forward with a Mincer age-earnings curve. The selection-bias toggle applies the Dale-Krueger shrinkage. Outcomes illustration, not a forecast — see methodology.
Shrinks the earnings premium toward the matched-applicant mean. STEM <15%, business ~40%, arts & education ~60%.
EARNINGS SUPPRESSED
Federal privacy rules suppressed earnings for Practical Nursing, Vocational Nursing and Nursing Assistants · Undergraduate Certificate or Diploma at Chisholm Trail Technology Center(cohort below 30 students). The calculator can’t produce a number we’d stand behind, so we don’t.
Outcomes illustration · not a forecast. Projects observed Scorecard earnings forward with a Mincer age-earnings curve under your assumptions. See methodology for the math.
SECTION 07 · SIMILAR INSTITUTIONS
Same sector and degree mix in Oklahoma
Picked by Carnegie sector × predominant credential level. These are not rankings — just nearest-neighbour surfaces for comparison.
CAUSAL DISCIPLINE
“Chisholm Trail Technology Center graduates earn $X” — not “Chisholm Trail Technology Center makes you earn $X”
Median earnings describe what cohorts earned. They do not describe what attending Chisholm Trail Technology Center caused. Selection effects (who admits, who enrolls, who completes) are real. We publish federal data with strict descriptive phrasing — and link the methodology where you can read about the limitations directly.