Oklahoma · Public · Predominantly certificates

Eastern Oklahoma County Technology Center

Choctaw, Oklahoma. 110 undergraduate students. 22 programs in the federal Field-of-Study dataset.

ANOMALY ENGINE · NOTABLE SIGNALS

What the data flags at Eastern Oklahoma County Technology Center

Short-arc shifts (recent 3-year window), peer outliers, earnings trend breaks, completion drops, enrollment cliffs, and debt-to-earnings warnings — surfaced deterministically from the federal record. Multi-decade shifts are reported separately in the Long Arc section, since 25-year tuition drift isn't really an anomaly.

PEER OUTLIER · TRENDING BETTER+46%

Public certificate-predominant peer

10-year earnings at Eastern Oklahoma County Technology Center are 46% above the public certificate-predominant peer median ($49.3k vs $33.7k).

LONG-ARC SHIFT · TRENDING BETTER+19%

First-year retention

First-year retention at Eastern Oklahoma County Technology Center rose 19% between 2021 and 2024 (72.2% → 85.7%).

SECTION 01 · OUTCOMES SNAPSHOT

The numbers, vs. Oklahoma

Each tile compares this institution to the Oklahoma median for the same metric. Sub-line shows the comparison value, not an interpretation. Sparklines trace the federally available history.

MEDIAN EARNINGS · 10Y
$49,311+0% · 6→10y
Oklahoma median $38,465
MEDIAN EARNINGS · 6Y
$49,138
Treasury earnings · 6y post-entry
COMPLETION · 150%
84.1%+39% · '99→'09
Oklahoma median 52.9%
MEDIAN FEDERAL DEBT
At program completion
UNDERGRAD ENROLLMENT
110
latest IPEDS
RETENTION
84.2%+104% · '04→'24
first-time, full-time
ADMISSION RATE
latest cohort
IN-STATE TUITION
annual
SECTION 02 · EARNINGS HORIZONS

How earnings spread, 4 to 10 years after entry

Treasury tax-record earnings for federally aided students who first enrolled at this institution. Each point is a horizon from the most-recent vintage. Single median per horizon (no p25/p75 publishing).

ALL FEDERALLY AIDED STUDENTS · TAX-RECORD EARNINGSVINTAGE 2025-05
Earnings widen with time post-entry. Selection: federal-aid recipients only — not all graduates.Methodology →
SECTION 04 · LONG ARC

Ten-plus year arc

Federally available history. Coverage varies by metric — IPEDS publishes some series only after 2009 and others only before.

UNDERGRAD · 19972009150
150019972009
Undergraduate enrollment.IPEDS EF
COMPLETION 150% · 1999200959.3%
80%36%19992009
150%-time completion rate.IPEDS GR
COMPLETION · 150% · 19992009+39%

Eastern Oklahoma County Technology Center · completion · 150% rose

42.6% → 59.3%

RETENTION · 20042024+104%

Eastern Oklahoma County Technology Center · retention rose

42.0% → 85.7%

UNDERGRAD ENROLLMENT · 19972009+75%

Eastern Oklahoma County Technology Center · undergrad enrollment rose

0 → 150

FINANCIAL OUTCOME · ILLUSTRATION

Estimate the financial outcome at Eastern Oklahoma County Technology Center

Pick a program. Cost from Scorecard net price by family income; earnings from Treasury 5-year-post-completion median, projected forward with a Mincer age-earnings curve. The selection-bias toggle applies the Dale-Krueger shrinkage. Outcomes illustration, not a forecast — see methodology.

Shrinks the earnings premium toward the matched-applicant mean. STEM <15%, business ~40%, arts & education ~60%.

NET PRESENT VALUE
$679,830
Over 40 years, discounted 5.0%
BREAKEVEN
Year 1
First year cumulative discounted earnings cross zero
graduationbreakeven · year 1year 0year 39
Cost per year
$11,517
HS-only baseline · OK
$33,800
Years to complete
1
CIP family
43

Outcomes illustration · not a forecast. Projects observed Scorecard earnings forward with a Mincer age-earnings curve under your assumptions. See methodology for the math.

CAUSAL DISCIPLINE

Eastern Oklahoma County Technology Center graduates earn $X” — not “Eastern Oklahoma County Technology Center makes you earn $X”

Median earnings describe what cohorts earned. They do not describe what attending Eastern Oklahoma County Technology Center caused. Selection effects (who admits, who enrolls, who completes) are real. We publish federal data with strict descriptive phrasing — and link the methodology where you can read about the limitations directly.

Methodology →