-19%
150%-time completion
150%-time completion at Mid-America Technology Center fell 19% between 2006 and 2009 (61.5% → 50.1%).
Oklahoma · Public · Predominantly certificates
Mid-America Technology Center
Wayne, Oklahoma. 147 undergraduate students. 26 programs in the federal Field-of-Study dataset.
ANOMALY ENGINE · NOTABLE SIGNALS
What the data flags at Mid-America Technology Center
Short-arc shifts (recent 3-year window), peer outliers, earnings trend breaks, completion drops, enrollment cliffs, and debt-to-earnings warnings — surfaced deterministically from the federal record. Multi-decade shifts are reported separately in the Long Arc section, since 25-year tuition drift isn't really an anomaly.
+85%
Undergraduate enrollment
Undergraduate enrollment at Mid-America Technology Center rose 85% between 2006 and 2009 (116 → 215).
+59%
Earnings trend · post-entry horizons
Earnings 10 years post-entry at Mid-America Technology Center are 59% above 6-year earnings ($24.2k → $38.5k).
+44%
First-year retention
First-year retention at Mid-America Technology Center rose 44% between 2021 and 2024 (66.7% → 95.8%).
SECTION 01 · OUTCOMES SNAPSHOT
The numbers, vs. Oklahoma
Each tile compares this institution to the Oklahoma median for the same metric. Sub-line shows the comparison value, not an interpretation. Sparklines trace the federally available history.
$38,465+59% · 6→10y
Oklahoma median $38,465$24,206
Treasury earnings · 6y post-entry100.0%-23% · '99→'09
Oklahoma median 52.9%—
At program completion147
latest IPEDS87.9%+57% · '04→'24
first-time, full-time—
latest cohort—
annualSECTION 02 · EARNINGS HORIZONS
How earnings spread, 4 to 10 years after entry
Treasury tax-record earnings for federally aided students who first enrolled at this institution. Each point is a horizon from the most-recent vintage. Single median per horizon (no p25/p75 publishing).
Earnings widen with time post-entry. Selection: federal-aid recipients only — not all graduates.Methodology →
SECTION 04 · LONG ARC
Ten-plus year arc
Federally available history. Coverage varies by metric — IPEDS publishes some series only after 2009 and others only before.
Undergraduate enrollment.
150%-time completion rate.
-23%
Mid-America Technology Center · completion · 150% fell
65.0% → 50.1%
+57%
Mid-America Technology Center · retention rose
61.0% → 95.8%
+108%
Mid-America Technology Center · undergrad enrollment rose
0 → 215
-62%
Mid-America Technology Center · pell share fell
7.4% → 2.8%
+91%
Mid-America Technology Center · earnings_median_10yr rose
$20,100 → $38,465
+35%
Mid-America Technology Center · earnings_median_8yr rose
$23,500 → $31,622
FINANCIAL OUTCOME · ILLUSTRATION
Estimate the financial outcome at Mid-America Technology Center
Pick a program. Cost from Scorecard net price by family income; earnings from Treasury 5-year-post-completion median, projected forward with a Mincer age-earnings curve. The selection-bias toggle applies the Dale-Krueger shrinkage. Outcomes illustration, not a forecast — see methodology.
Shrinks the earnings premium toward the matched-applicant mean. STEM <15%, business ~40%, arts & education ~60%.
EARNINGS SUPPRESSED
Federal privacy rules suppressed earnings for Vehicle Maintenance and Repair Technologies · Undergraduate Certificate or Diploma at Mid-America Technology Center(cohort below 30 students). The calculator can’t produce a number we’d stand behind, so we don’t.
Outcomes illustration · not a forecast. Projects observed Scorecard earnings forward with a Mincer age-earnings curve under your assumptions. See methodology for the math.
SECTION 07 · SIMILAR INSTITUTIONS
Same sector and degree mix in Oklahoma
Picked by Carnegie sector × predominant credential level. These are not rankings — just nearest-neighbour surfaces for comparison.
CAUSAL DISCIPLINE
“Mid-America Technology Center graduates earn $X” — not “Mid-America Technology Center makes you earn $X”
Median earnings describe what cohorts earned. They do not describe what attending Mid-America Technology Center caused. Selection effects (who admits, who enrolls, who completes) are real. We publish federal data with strict descriptive phrasing — and link the methodology where you can read about the limitations directly.