Strand Institute of Beauty & Esthetics
Portland, Texas. 71 undergraduate students. 2 programs in the federal Field-of-Study dataset.
The numbers, vs. Texas
Each tile compares this institution to the Texas median for the same metric. Sub-line shows the comparison value, not an interpretation. Sparklines trace the federally available history.
Ten-plus year arc
Federally available history. Coverage varies by metric — IPEDS publishes some series only after 2009 and others only before.
Strand Institute of Beauty & Esthetics · retention fell
100.0% → 83.3%
Strand Institute of Beauty & Esthetics · undergrad enrollment rose
11 → 65
Strand Institute of Beauty & Esthetics · pell share rose
24.5% → 40.2%
Estimate the financial outcome at Strand Institute of Beauty & Esthetics
Pick a program. Cost from Scorecard net price by family income; earnings from Treasury 5-year-post-completion median, projected forward with a Mincer age-earnings curve. The selection-bias toggle applies the Dale-Krueger shrinkage. Outcomes illustration, not a forecast — see methodology.
Shrinks the earnings premium toward the matched-applicant mean. STEM <15%, business ~40%, arts & education ~60%.
Federal privacy rules suppressed earnings for Cosmetology and Related Personal Grooming Services · Undergraduate Certificate or Diploma at Strand Institute of Beauty & Esthetics(cohort below 30 students). The calculator can’t produce a number we’d stand behind, so we don’t.
Outcomes illustration · not a forecast. Projects observed Scorecard earnings forward with a Mincer age-earnings curve under your assumptions. See methodology for the math.
Same sector and degree mix in Texas
Picked by Carnegie sector × predominant credential level. These are not rankings — just nearest-neighbour surfaces for comparison.
“Strand Institute of Beauty & Esthetics graduates earn $X” — not “Strand Institute of Beauty & Esthetics makes you earn $X”
Median earnings describe what cohorts earned. They do not describe what attending Strand Institute of Beauty & Esthetics caused. Selection effects (who admits, who enrolls, who completes) are real. We publish federal data with strict descriptive phrasing — and link the methodology where you can read about the limitations directly.