Virginia · Private nonprofit · Predominantly graduate

Divine Mercy University

Sterling, Virginia. 6 programs in the federal Field-of-Study dataset.

SECTION 01 · OUTCOMES SNAPSHOT

The numbers, vs. Virginia

Each tile compares this institution to the Virginia median for the same metric. Sub-line shows the comparison value, not an interpretation. Sparklines trace the federally available history.

MEDIAN EARNINGS · 10Y
Virginia median $44,813
MEDIAN EARNINGS · 6Y
Treasury earnings · 6y post-entry
COMPLETION · 150%
Virginia median 50.7%
MEDIAN FEDERAL DEBT
At program completion
UNDERGRAD ENROLLMENT
latest IPEDS
RETENTION
first-time, full-time
ADMISSION RATE
latest cohort
IN-STATE TUITION
annual
FINANCIAL OUTCOME · ILLUSTRATION

Estimate the financial outcome at Divine Mercy University

Pick a program. Cost from Scorecard net price by family income; earnings from Treasury 5-year-post-completion median, projected forward with a Mincer age-earnings curve. The selection-bias toggle applies the Dale-Krueger shrinkage. Outcomes illustration, not a forecast — see methodology.

Shrinks the earnings premium toward the matched-applicant mean. STEM <15%, business ~40%, arts & education ~60%.

EARNINGS SUPPRESSED

Federal privacy rules suppressed earnings for Mental and Social Health Services and Allied Professions · Master's Degree at Divine Mercy University(cohort below 30 students). The calculator can’t produce a number we’d stand behind, so we don’t.

Outcomes illustration · not a forecast. Projects observed Scorecard earnings forward with a Mincer age-earnings curve under your assumptions. See methodology for the math.

CAUSAL DISCIPLINE

Divine Mercy University graduates earn $X” — not “Divine Mercy University makes you earn $X”

Median earnings describe what cohorts earned. They do not describe what attending Divine Mercy University caused. Selection effects (who admits, who enrolls, who completes) are real. We publish federal data with strict descriptive phrasing — and link the methodology where you can read about the limitations directly.

Methodology →