100%-time completion
100%-time completion at George C Wallace Community College-Dothan fell 19% between 2009 and 2010 (21.9% → 17.8%).
Dothan, Alabama. 3,053 undergraduate students. 31 programs in the federal Field-of-Study dataset.
Short-arc shifts (recent 3-year window), peer outliers, earnings trend breaks, completion drops, enrollment cliffs, and debt-to-earnings warnings — surfaced deterministically from the federal record. Multi-decade shifts are reported separately in the Long Arc section, since 25-year tuition drift isn't really an anomaly.
100%-time completion at George C Wallace Community College-Dothan fell 19% between 2009 and 2010 (21.9% → 17.8%).
Median federal debt at exit at George C Wallace Community College-Dothan fell 17% between 1999 and 2001 ($4.2k → $3.5k).
Each tile compares this institution to the Alabama median for the same metric. Sub-line shows the comparison value, not an interpretation. Sparklines trace the federally available history.
Treasury tax-record earnings for federally aided students who first enrolled at this institution. Each point is a horizon from the most-recent vintage. Single median per horizon (no p25/p75 publishing).
Federally available history. Coverage varies by metric — IPEDS publishes some series only after 2009 and others only before.
12.6% → 17.8%
55.0% → 62.5%
$1,296 → $4,980
$2,496 → $8,850
9.0% → 47.1%
$25,900 → $31,399
$24,400 → $30,306
$21,800 → $28,431
Each row is one (CIP × credential) program reported by the institution in College Scorecard's Field-of-Study data. Cohort floor is 30 students; below this, federal data is suppressed.
Programs are grouped by 2-digit CIP family. Programs without reported earnings are hidden to keep the list focused.
Picked by Carnegie sector × predominant credential level. These are not rankings — just nearest-neighbour surfaces for comparison.
Median earnings describe what cohorts earned. They do not describe what attending George C Wallace Community College-Dothan caused. Selection effects (who admits, who enrolls, who completes) are real. We publish federal data with strict descriptive phrasing — and link the methodology where you can read about the limitations directly.