Arizona · Public · Predominantly associate's

Dine College

Tsaile, Arizona. 1,507 undergraduate students. 37 programs in the federal Field-of-Study dataset.

ANOMALY ENGINE · NOTABLE SIGNALS

What the data flags at Dine College

Short-arc shifts (recent 3-year window), peer outliers, earnings trend breaks, completion drops, enrollment cliffs, and debt-to-earnings warnings — surfaced deterministically from the federal record. Multi-decade shifts are reported separately in the Long Arc section, since 25-year tuition drift isn't really an anomaly.

COMPLETION DROP · TRENDING WORSE-9pp

150%-time completion

150%-time completion fell 9 pp at Dine College vs the 2018–2022 baseline (5.5% vs 14.7%).

LONG-ARC SHIFT · TRENDING BETTER+424%

First-year retention

First-year retention at Dine College rose 424% between 2021 and 2024 (9.1% → 47.6%).

LONG-ARC SHIFT · TRENDING BETTER+114%

150%-time completion

150%-time completion at Dine College rose 114% between 2021 and 2024 (5.9% → 12.6%).

LONG-ARC SHIFT · TRENDING BETTER+12%

Undergraduate enrollment

Undergraduate enrollment at Dine College rose 12% between 2021 and 2024 (1.2k → 1.4k).

SECTION 01 · OUTCOMES SNAPSHOT

The numbers, vs. Arizona

Each tile compares this institution to the Arizona median for the same metric. Sub-line shows the comparison value, not an interpretation. Sparklines trace the federally available history.

MEDIAN EARNINGS · 10Y
$29,188+26% · 6→10y
Arizona median $39,817
MEDIAN EARNINGS · 6Y
$23,195
Treasury earnings · 6y post-entry
COMPLETION · 150%
5.5%+552% · '99→'24
Arizona median 43.0%
MEDIAN FEDERAL DEBT
At program completion
UNDERGRAD ENROLLMENT
1,507-20% · '96→'24
latest IPEDS
RETENTION
33.3%-18% · '04→'24
first-time, full-time
ADMISSION RATE
latest cohort
IN-STATE TUITION
$1,410+114% · '01→'24
out-of-state $1,410
SECTION 02 · EARNINGS HORIZONS

How earnings spread, 4 to 10 years after entry

Treasury tax-record earnings for federally aided students who first enrolled at this institution. Each point is a horizon from the most-recent vintage. Single median per horizon (no p25/p75 publishing).

ALL FEDERALLY AIDED STUDENTS · TAX-RECORD EARNINGSVINTAGE 2025-05
Earnings widen with time post-entry. Selection: federal-aid recipients only — not all graduates.Methodology →
SECTION 04 · LONG ARC

Ten-plus year arc

Federally available history. Coverage varies by metric — IPEDS publishes some series only after 2009 and others only before.

UNDERGRAD · 199620241,375
1,97841419962024
Undergraduate enrollment.IPEDS EF
COMPLETION 150% · 1999202412.6%
100%0%19992024
150%-time completion rate.IPEDS GR
COMPLETION · 150% · 19992024+213%

Dine College · completion · 150% rose

1.9% → 12.6%

RETENTION · 20042024-18%

Dine College · retention fell

58.0% → 47.6%

IN-STATE TUITION · 20012024+75%

Dine College · in-state tuition rose

$660 → $1,410

OUT-OF-STATE TUITION · 20012024+75%

Dine College · out-of-state tuition rose

$660 → $1,410

EARNINGS_MEDIAN_10YR · 20072020+25%

Dine College · earnings_median_10yr rose

$23,400 → $29,188

EARNINGS_MEDIAN_8YR · 20052020+35%

Dine College · earnings_median_8yr rose

$19,800 → $26,817

EARNINGS_MEDIAN_6YR · 20032020+30%

Dine College · earnings_median_6yr rose

$17,800 → $23,195

SECTION 05 · PROGRAMS

Ranked by 5-year earnings

Each row is one (CIP × credential) program reported by the institution in College Scorecard's Field-of-Study data. Cohort floor is 30 students; below this, federal data is suppressed.

SECTION 06 · BY CIP FAMILY

2 programs with earnings, grouped

Programs are grouped by 2-digit CIP family. Programs without reported earnings are hidden to keep the list focused.

LIBERAL ARTS & GENERAL STUDIES · CIP 24

SOCIAL SCIENCES · CIP 45

CAUSAL DISCIPLINE

Dine College graduates earn $X” — not “Dine College makes you earn $X”

Median earnings describe what cohorts earned. They do not describe what attending Dine College caused. Selection effects (who admits, who enrolls, who completes) are real. We publish federal data with strict descriptive phrasing — and link the methodology where you can read about the limitations directly.

Methodology →